New York Times Admits It’s Basically Obama’s Campaign Newsletter

The only surprise here is that the NYT’s own ombudsman admits that the paper is Obama’s best friend:

Many critics view The Times as constitutionally unable to address the election in an unbiased fashion. Like a lot of America, it basked a bit in the warm glow of Mr. Obama’s election in 2008. The company published a book about the country’s first African-American president, “Obama: The Historic Journey.” The Times also published a lengthy portrait of him in its Times Topics section on, yet there’s nothing of the kind about George W. Bush or his father. [emphasis added]

Read more:

Another reason why few people get worked up when Democrats stuff ballot boxes in key swing states.


Published by: bhennessy

Bill Hennessy is co-founder of St. Louis Tea Party Coalition, expert in persuasive design and marketing, and author of three books, including The Conservative Manifesto (1993) and Zen Conservatism (2009)

Categories Latest1 Comment

One thought on “New York Times Admits It’s Basically Obama’s Campaign Newsletter”

  1. Doesn’t the three words immediately before the emphasized text (“Many critics view”) indicate that it was not Brisbane (e.g., the public editor) talking about the slanted view of “The Times”? I read the rest of the piece and found no support that this was the view of the author. Indeed, the rest of the piece was a defense of The Times policies, indicating several stories published by the paper that were supposedly critical of the actions of Obama. Context is everything.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s